A10 9630P vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The 9630P is based on Excavator architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 2.2 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 2.2 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
810f10
Core
Bristol Ridge
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2016
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
23.7k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.92k points
71.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9630P
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.52k
10.73k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
18.15k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
3.99k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.79k
3.89k (x2.17)
TOTAL
23.7k
36.77k (x1.55)
Multithread
9630P
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.83k
20.11k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
14.44k
36.87k (x2.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
10.74k (x2.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
3.31k (x1.61)
TOTAL
32.92k
71.02k (x2.16)
Performance/W
9630P
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
285 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
321 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
732 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
9630P
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3344 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
7183 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4