Core i9-13900KS vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i9-13900KS is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900KS gets a score of 1708.6 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900KS is 4.9 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900KS gets a score of 1708.6 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900KS is 4.9 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
870f10
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
6/12
TDP
150 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2023
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
127.35k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
1708.56k points
348.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900KS
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
57.69k
16.04k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
33.34k
24.47k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.55k
8.38k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.76k
21.66k (x1.15)
TOTAL
127.35k
70.55k (x0.55)
Multithread
i9-13900KS
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
757.76k
113.63k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
626.83k
143.55k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
294.93k
63.84k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.05k
27.34k (x0.94)
TOTAL
1708.56k
348.35k (x0.2)
Performance/W
i9-13900KS
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5052 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4179 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1966 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
194 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
11390 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13900KS
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
9616 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5557 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2925 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3127 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
21226 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4