| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900KF vs i5-13600K


Description
Both models i9-13900KF and i5-13600K are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900KF gets a score of 1660 k points while the i5-13600K gets 1023.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 1.6 times faster than the i5-13600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
24/32
14/20
TDP
125 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
6x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2022
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
128.79k points
115.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
1660.01k points
1023.59k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900KF
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
61.1k
54.36k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
31.23k
29.93k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.57k
15.39k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.89k
15.52k (x0.82)
TOTAL
128.79k
115.19k (x0.89)

Multithread

i9-13900KF

i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
767.22k
457.21k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
576.38k
360.82k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284.31k
172.64k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.09k
32.91k (x1.03)
TOTAL
1660.01k
1023.59k (x0.62)

Performance/W
i9-13900KF
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
6138 points/W
3658 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4611 points/W
2887 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2274 points/W
1381 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
257 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
13280 points/W
8189 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900KF
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
10535 points/GHz
10658 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5384 points/GHz
5869 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3030 points/GHz
3018 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3257 points/GHz
3042 points/GHz
TOTAL
22206 points/GHz
22587 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4