Core i9-13900HX vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 877.5 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 1.3 times faster than the i9-13900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 877.5 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 1.3 times faster than the i9-13900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
406f1
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
24/32
14/28
TDP
55 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
35840 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
104.9k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
877.5k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
49.8k
17.8k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
26.07k
16.51k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.65k
4.47k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.38k
2.56k (x0.17)
TOTAL
104.9k
41.35k (x0.39)
Multithread
i9-13900HX
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
375.69k
494.82k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
329.21k
514.13k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
157.71k
132.87k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.89k
20.8k (x1.4)
TOTAL
877.5k
1162.63k (x1.32)
Performance/W
i9-13900HX
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6831 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5986 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2867 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
271 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
15955 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
9222 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4828 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2529 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
19427 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4