| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900HX vs i5-1335U


Description
Both models i9-13900HX and i5-1335U are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 4.1 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
b06a3
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Raptor Lake-U
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
24/32
10/12
TDP
55 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
112.85k points
92.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
1160.72k points
282.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
53.69k
37.94k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
28.76k
26.18k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.93k
13.86k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.47k
14.48k (x0.94)
TOTAL
112.85k
92.46k (x0.82)

Multithread

i9-13900HX

i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
526.44k
125.7k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
420.48k
93.63k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
196.13k
46.18k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.68k
16.75k (x0.95)
TOTAL
1160.72k
282.25k (x0.24)

Performance/W
i9-13900HX
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
9572 points/W
8380 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7645 points/W
6242 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3566 points/W
3079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
321 points/W
1117 points/W
TOTAL
21104 points/W
18817 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
9942 points/GHz
8248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
5692 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2765 points/GHz
3013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2865 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
TOTAL
20898 points/GHz
20100 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4