| | | | | | |

Core i7-13700T vs i7-10870H


Description
The i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700T gets a score of 951.3 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700T is 2 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a0652
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
1.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
16/24
8/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
107.15k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
951.3k points
487.05k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700T
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
46.53k
30.38k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
28.48k
27.95k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.08k
6.51k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
14.37k (x0.84)
TOTAL
107.15k
79.2k (x0.74)

Multithread

i7-13700T

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
443.98k
216.18k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
343.34k
210.82k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147.61k
51.57k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.36k
8.47k (x0.52)
TOTAL
951.3k
487.05k (x0.51)

Performance/W
i7-13700T
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
12685 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
9810 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4217 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
468 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
27180 points/W
10823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-13700T
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
9496 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5812 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3077 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3483 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
21868 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4