Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen 9 3900
Description
The i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f2
870f10
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/16
12/24
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
687.5k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
16.85k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
26.03k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
9.54k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
22.55k (x1.86)
TOTAL
100.11k
74.97k (x0.75)
Multithread
i5-13400
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
229.41k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
292.81k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
128.48k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
36.8k (x0.96)
TOTAL
497.83k
687.5k (x1.38)
Performance/W
i5-13400
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
10577 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-13400
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4