| | | | | | |

Core i5-13400 vs i5-1335U


Description
Both models i5-13400 and i5-1335U are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.8 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
b06a3
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-U
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
10/16
10/12
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
92.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
282.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
37.94k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
26.18k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
13.86k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
14.48k (x1.2)
TOTAL
100.11k
92.46k (x0.92)

Multithread

i5-13400

i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
125.7k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
93.63k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
46.18k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
16.75k (x0.44)
TOTAL
497.83k
282.25k (x0.57)

Performance/W
i5-13400
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
8380 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
6242 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
3079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
1117 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
18817 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13400
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
8248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
5692 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
3013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
20100 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4