| | | | | | |

Core i3-13100F vs i5-1335U


Description
Both models i3-13100F and i5-1335U are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f5
b06a3
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-U
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/12
TDP
58 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
92.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
282.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
37.94k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
26.18k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
13.86k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
14.48k (x0.98)
TOTAL
100.94k
92.46k (x0.92)

Multithread

i3-13100F

i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
125.7k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
93.63k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
46.18k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
16.75k (x1.09)
TOTAL
390.23k
282.25k (x0.72)

Performance/W
i3-13100F
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
8380 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
6242 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
3079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
1117 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
18817 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
8248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5692 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
3013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
20100 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4