| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900KF vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D


Description
The i9-13900KF is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 7950X3D is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900KF gets a score of 1660 k points while the 7950X3D gets 1667.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 1 times faster than the i9-13900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a60f12
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raphael
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM5
Cores/Threads
24/32
16/32
TDP
125 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
131072 kB
Date
September 2022
February 2023
Mean monothread perf.
128.79k points
119.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
1660.01k points
1667.14k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900KF
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
61.1k
40.42k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
31.23k
30.72k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.57k
16.31k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.89k
32.14k (x1.7)
TOTAL
128.79k
119.58k (x0.93)

Multithread

i9-13900KF

7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
767.22k
643.38k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
576.38k
526.18k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284.31k
272.65k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.09k
224.93k (x7.01)
TOTAL
1660.01k
1667.14k (x1)

Performance/W
i9-13900KF
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
6138 points/W
5362 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4611 points/W
4385 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2274 points/W
2272 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
257 points/W
1874 points/W
TOTAL
13280 points/W
13893 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900KF
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
10535 points/GHz
7091 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5384 points/GHz
5389 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3030 points/GHz
2861 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3257 points/GHz
5638 points/GHz
TOTAL
22206 points/GHz
20979 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4