| | | | | | |

Core i3-13100F vs i9-13900HX


Description
Both models i3-13100F and i9-13900HX are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 885.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.3 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f5
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
4/8
24/32
TDP
58 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
110.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
885.37k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
53.97k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
28.92k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
12.85k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
15.25k (x1.03)
TOTAL
100.94k
110.99k (x1.1)

Multithread

i3-13100F

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
374.2k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
331.24k (x2.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
164.06k (x2.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
15.87k (x1.03)
TOTAL
390.23k
885.37k (x2.27)

Performance/W
i3-13100F
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
6804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
6023 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
2983 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
289 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
16098 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
9994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
2825 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
20553 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4