Core i7-12800H vs Ryzen 3 1200
Description
The i7-12800H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1200 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12800H gets a score of 467.4 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12800H is 4 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12800H gets a score of 467.4 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12800H is 4 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
800f11
Core
Alder Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM4
Cores/Threads
14/20
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280/2x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2022
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
67.13k points
37.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
467.41k points
117.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12800H
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
28.42k
11.73k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
18.93k
18.85k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
4.22k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.86k
2.76k (x0.28)
TOTAL
67.13k
37.55k (x0.56)
Multithread
i7-12800H
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
205.57k
38.56k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
159.7k
62.21k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
82.78k
13.7k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.36k
3.33k (x0.17)
TOTAL
467.41k
117.81k (x0.25)
Performance/W
i7-12800H
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
593 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3549 points/W
957 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1840 points/W
211 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
430 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
10387 points/W
1812 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-12800H
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
5921 points/GHz
3449 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3944 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2066 points/GHz
1242 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2055 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
13986 points/GHz
11045 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4