| | | | | | |

Core i7-12800H vs i9-13900HX


Description
The i7-12800H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12800H gets a score of 467.4 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.5 times faster than the i7-12800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
b0671
Core
Alder Lake-H
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
14/20
24/32
TDP
45 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280/2x2048 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
36864 kB
Date
February 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
67.13k points
112.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
467.41k points
1160.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12800H
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
28.42k
53.69k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
18.93k
28.76k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
14.93k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.86k
15.47k (x1.57)
TOTAL
67.13k
112.85k (x1.68)

Multithread

i7-12800H

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
205.57k
526.44k (x2.56)
Test#2 (FP)
159.7k
420.48k (x2.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
82.78k
196.13k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.36k
17.68k (x0.91)
TOTAL
467.41k
1160.72k (x2.48)

Performance/W
i7-12800H
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
9572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3549 points/W
7645 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1840 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
430 points/W
321 points/W
TOTAL
10387 points/W
21104 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-12800H
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
5921 points/GHz
9942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3944 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2066 points/GHz
2765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2055 points/GHz
2865 points/GHz
TOTAL
13986 points/GHz
20898 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4