| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs i9-9900K


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.4 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
906ec
Core
Alder Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
117 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
545.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400F
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
7.43k
5.17k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
18.64k
21.15k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
7.01k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.82k
15.32k (x1.03)
TOTAL
54.04k
48.66k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
36.23k
38.45k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
134.76k
155.68k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.06k
51k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
18.26k (x1.09)
TOTAL
271.76k
263.38k (x0.97)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
33.62k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
30.02k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
7.17k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
15.43k (x1.31)
TOTAL
76.46k
86.24k (x1.13)

Multithread

i5-12400F

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
248.93k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
224.43k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
53.39k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
18.54k (x0.98)
TOTAL
399.39k
545.3k (x1.37)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
5740 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4