| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400 vs i5-1335U


Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
b06a3
Core
Arder Lake-S
Raptor Lake-U
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/12
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
92.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
282.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
37.94k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
26.18k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
13.86k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
14.48k (x0.98)
TOTAL
102.51k
92.46k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-12400

i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
125.7k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
93.63k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
46.18k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
16.75k (x0.77)
TOTAL
544.64k
282.25k (x0.52)

Performance/W
i5-12400
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
8380 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
6242 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
3079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
1117 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
18817 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
8248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
5692 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
3013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
20100 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4