Core i3-1215U vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 3.9 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 3.9 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
a70f41
Core
Alder Lake-H
Phoenix
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
6/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2022
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
113.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
718.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
38.25k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
29.92k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
15.5k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
29.89k (x2.9)
TOTAL
80.34k
113.57k (x1.41)
Multithread
i3-1215U
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
309.6k (x4.19)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
260.4k (x3.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
128.56k (x4.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
20.04k (x2.08)
TOTAL
185.6k
718.59k (x3.87)
Performance/W
i3-1215U
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
8846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
7440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
3673 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
573 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
20531 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
7355 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
2981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
21839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4