Core i9-11900K vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 2.7 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 2.7 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
50654
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
125 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
11264 kB
Date
March 2021
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
101.11k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
748.02k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900K
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
36.08k
18.78k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
30.19k
16.25k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.96k
3.99k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.88k
6.8k (x0.31)
TOTAL
101.11k
45.82k (x0.45)
Multithread
i9-11900K
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
311.76k
133.55k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
314.01k
108.43k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112.23k
30.02k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.02k
9.48k (x0.95)
TOTAL
748.02k
281.48k (x0.38)
Performance/W
i9-11900K
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
2494 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2512 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
898 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
80 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
5984 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900K
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
6807 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5695 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2446 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4129 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
19077 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4