Core i9-11900K vs i5-4690
Description
The i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i5-4690 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 4.6 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 4.6 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
306c3
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
125 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2021
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
101.11k points
45.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
748.02k points
163.95k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900K
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
36.08k
22.97k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
30.19k
13.02k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.96k
5.21k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.88k
4.74k (x0.22)
TOTAL
101.11k
45.95k (x0.45)
Multithread
i9-11900K
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
311.76k
85.98k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
314.01k
49.01k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112.23k
19.5k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.02k
9.46k (x0.94)
TOTAL
748.02k
163.95k (x0.22)
Performance/W
i9-11900K
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
2494 points/W
1024 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2512 points/W
583 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
898 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
80 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
5984 points/W
1952 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900K
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
6807 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5695 points/GHz
3339 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2446 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4129 points/GHz
1216 points/GHz
TOTAL
19077 points/GHz
11781 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4