| | | | | | |

Core i9-11900K vs i7-1260P


Description
The i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 1.9 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
906a3
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/16
TDP
125 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
18432 kB
Date
March 2021
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
101.11k points
94.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
748.02k points
391.07k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900K
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
36.08k
41.94k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
30.19k
26.81k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.96k
12.63k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.88k
13.51k (x0.62)
TOTAL
101.11k
94.9k (x0.94)

Multithread

i9-11900K

i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
311.76k
168.12k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
314.01k
148.09k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112.23k
60.28k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.02k
14.58k (x1.45)
TOTAL
748.02k
391.07k (x0.52)

Performance/W
i9-11900K
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
2494 points/W
6004 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2512 points/W
5289 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
898 points/W
2153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
80 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
5984 points/W
13967 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-11900K
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
6807 points/GHz
8924 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5695 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2446 points/GHz
2687 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4129 points/GHz
2875 points/GHz
TOTAL
19077 points/GHz
20191 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4