| | | | | | |

Core i9-11900K vs i5-1135G7


Description
The i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 238.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 3.1 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
806c1
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
125 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
101.11k points
68.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
748.02k points
238.87k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900K
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
36.08k
25.96k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
30.19k
23.42k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.96k
10.1k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.88k
8.71k (x0.4)
TOTAL
101.11k
68.19k (x0.67)

Multithread

i9-11900K

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
311.76k
94.88k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
314.01k
99.81k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112.23k
33.6k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.02k
10.58k (x1.06)
TOTAL
748.02k
238.87k (x0.32)

Performance/W
i9-11900K
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2494 points/W
3389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2512 points/W
3565 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
898 points/W
1200 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
80 points/W
378 points/W
TOTAL
5984 points/W
8531 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-11900K
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6807 points/GHz
6180 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5695 points/GHz
5576 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2446 points/GHz
2405 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4129 points/GHz
2075 points/GHz
TOTAL
19077 points/GHz
16235 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4