Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 9 5950X
Description
The i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the 5950X gets 1081 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 1.8 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the 5950X gets 1081 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 1.8 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
a20f10
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/32
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
May 2021
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
89.19k points
87.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
584.47k points
1080.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900H
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
33.38k
22.91k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
27.12k
26.24k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
11.87k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
17k
26.28k (x1.55)
TOTAL
89.19k
87.3k (x0.98)
Multithread
i9-11900H
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
249.83k
359.17k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
237.26k
479.04k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.18k
214.59k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
28.16k (x2.13)
TOTAL
584.47k
1080.96k (x1.85)
Performance/W
i9-11900H
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
5552 points/W
3421 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5272 points/W
4562 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1871 points/W
2044 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
293 points/W
268 points/W
TOTAL
12988 points/W
10295 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900H
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
6812 points/GHz
4676 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5535 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2386 points/GHz
2423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3469 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
TOTAL
18202 points/GHz
17817 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4