Core i7-1185G7 vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1185G7 gets a score of 230.9 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1185G7 gets a score of 230.9 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
50654
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
11264 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
60.87k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
230.91k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1185G7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
24.35k
18.78k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
20.07k
16.25k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.61k
3.99k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.84k
6.8k (x0.87)
TOTAL
60.87k
45.82k (x0.75)
Multithread
i7-1185G7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
93.58k
133.55k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
94.71k
108.43k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.28k
30.02k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.34k
9.48k (x1.02)
TOTAL
230.91k
281.48k (x1.22)
Performance/W
i7-1185G7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3342 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3383 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1189 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
334 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
8247 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1185G7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
5074 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4182 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1793 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1633 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
12682 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4