| | | | | | |

Core i7-1185G7 vs i5-1038NG7


Description
The i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1185G7 gets a score of 230.9 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1038NG7 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
706e5
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.87k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
230.91k points
243.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1185G7
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
24.35k
23.2k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
20.07k
21.2k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.61k
9.4k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.84k
11.54k (x1.47)
TOTAL
60.87k
65.35k (x1.07)

Multithread

i7-1185G7

i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
93.58k
94.68k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
94.71k
103.38k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.28k
35.79k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.34k
9.33k (x1)
TOTAL
230.91k
243.18k (x1.05)

Performance/W
i7-1185G7
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
3342 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3383 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1189 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
334 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
8247 points/W
8685 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1185G7
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
5074 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4182 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1793 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1633 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
12682 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4