| | | | | | |

Core i7-1185G7 vs i3-10110U


Description
The i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1185G7 gets a score of 230.9 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1185G7 is 2.2 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
806ec
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.87k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
230.91k points
106.58k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1185G7
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.35k
24.6k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
20.07k
22.32k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.61k
5.02k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.84k
4.7k (x0.6)
TOTAL
60.87k
56.64k (x0.93)

Multithread

i7-1185G7

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
93.58k
47.98k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
94.71k
44.28k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.28k
10.33k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.34k
3.98k (x0.43)
TOTAL
230.91k
106.58k (x0.46)

Performance/W
i7-1185G7
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3342 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3383 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1189 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
334 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
8247 points/W
7105 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1185G7
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
5074 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4182 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1793 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1633 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
12682 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4