| | | | | | |

Core i7-1185G7 vs Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition


Description
The i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1185G7 gets a score of 230.9 k points while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets 174.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1185G7 is 1.3 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
810f81
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.87k points
45.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
230.91k points
174.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1185G7
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
24.35k
13.77k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
20.07k
22.62k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.61k
4.91k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.84k
4k (x0.51)
TOTAL
60.87k
45.3k (x0.74)

Multithread

i7-1185G7

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
93.58k
50.44k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
94.71k
94k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.28k
25.64k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.34k
4.11k (x0.44)
TOTAL
230.91k
174.19k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i7-1185G7
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3342 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3383 points/W
6267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1189 points/W
1710 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
334 points/W
274 points/W
TOTAL
8247 points/W
11613 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1185G7
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
5074 points/GHz
3722 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4182 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1793 points/GHz
1326 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1633 points/GHz
1082 points/GHz
TOTAL
12682 points/GHz
12243 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4