| | | | | | |

Core i7-1185G7 vs i5-12500H


Description
The i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1185G7 gets a score of 230.9 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1185G7 is 1 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
906a3
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/16
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2020
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
60.87k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
230.91k points
225.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1185G7
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.35k
22.61k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
20.07k
17.73k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.61k
9.63k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.84k
8.4k (x1.07)
TOTAL
60.87k
58.37k (x0.96)

Multithread

i7-1185G7

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
93.58k
85.49k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
94.71k
94.93k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.28k
39.15k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.34k
6.08k (x0.65)
TOTAL
230.91k
225.65k (x0.98)

Performance/W
i7-1185G7
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3342 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3383 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1189 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
334 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
8247 points/W
5014 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1185G7
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
5074 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4182 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1793 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1633 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
12682 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4