Core i7-11800H vs i3-8350K
Description
The i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 2.6 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 2.6 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
906eb
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
91 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2021
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
68.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
607.38k points
237.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
33.02k
27.29k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
26.55k
24.19k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
5.75k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.06k
11.13k (x0.65)
TOTAL
88.34k
68.36k (x0.77)
Multithread
i7-11800H
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
260.97k
107.78k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
248.94k
95.93k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86.55k
22.65k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.91k
11.26k (x1.03)
TOTAL
607.38k
237.63k (x0.39)
Performance/W
i7-11800H
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
5799 points/W
1184 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/W
1054 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1923 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
13497 points/W
2611 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11800H
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
7177 points/GHz
6823 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5771 points/GHz
6048 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
1436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3709 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
TOTAL
19204 points/GHz
17091 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4