Core i7-11800H vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
Description
The i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.2 times faster than the i7-11800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.2 times faster than the i7-11800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
a70f41
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Phoenix
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2021
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
113.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
607.38k points
718.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
33.02k
38.25k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
26.55k
29.92k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
15.5k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.06k
29.89k (x1.75)
TOTAL
88.34k
113.57k (x1.29)
Multithread
i7-11800H
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
260.97k
309.6k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
248.94k
260.4k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86.55k
128.56k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.91k
20.04k (x1.84)
TOTAL
607.38k
718.59k (x1.18)
Performance/W
i7-11800H
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5799 points/W
8846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/W
7440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1923 points/W
3673 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
573 points/W
TOTAL
13497 points/W
20531 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11800H
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
7177 points/GHz
7355 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5771 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
2981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3709 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
TOTAL
19204 points/GHz
21839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4