| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H vs i5-11400F


Description
The i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d1
a0671
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2021
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
607.38k points
495.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
33.02k
31.66k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
26.55k
26.21k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
11.96k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.06k
18.5k (x1.08)
TOTAL
88.34k
88.34k (x1)

Multithread

i7-11800H

i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
260.97k
210.36k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
248.94k
203.84k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86.55k
72.05k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.91k
9.4k (x0.86)
TOTAL
607.38k
495.65k (x0.82)

Performance/W
i7-11800H
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5799 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1923 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
13497 points/W
7625 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7177 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5771 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3709 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
19204 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4