Core i7-11700F vs i7-7700K
Description
The i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i7-7700K is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700F gets a score of 512.3 k points while the i7-7700K gets 289.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.8 times faster than the i7-7700K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700F gets a score of 512.3 k points while the i7-7700K gets 289.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.8 times faster than the i7-7700K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
906e9
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
89.58k points
76.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.32k points
289.82k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700F
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
32.55k
30.44k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
26.95k
26.91k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.76k
6.25k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.32k
13.3k (x0.69)
TOTAL
89.58k
76.9k (x0.86)
Multithread
i7-11700F
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
232.06k
127.73k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
203.56k
123.68k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.89k
29.34k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
9.08k (x2.38)
TOTAL
512.32k
289.82k (x0.57)
Performance/W
i7-11700F
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/W
1345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3132 points/W
1302 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1121 points/W
309 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
7882 points/W
3051 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11700F
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
6642 points/GHz
6765 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2196 points/GHz
1388 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3943 points/GHz
2955 points/GHz
TOTAL
18281 points/GHz
17089 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4