Core i7-11700 vs Xeon E5-2660 v2
Description
The i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700 gets a score of 544.2 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2660 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700 gets a score of 544.2 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2660 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
306e4
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
8/16
10 /20
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
25600 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
98.87k points
19.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
728.98k points
459.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11700
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
18.96k
7.26k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
28.34k
6.9k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.26k
2.77k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.2k
2.55k (x0.13)
TOTAL
80.76k
19.48k (x0.24)
Multithread
i7-11700
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
164.31k
180.2k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
253.96k
191.43k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.28k
80.22k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.65k
7.46k (x0.7)
TOTAL
544.2k
459.31k (x0.84)
Performance/W
i7-11700
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2528 points/W
1897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3907 points/W
2015 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1773 points/W
844 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
8372 points/W
4835 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11700
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3869 points/GHz
2420 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5784 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2707 points/GHz
923 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4123 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
16482 points/GHz
6495 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4