| | | | | | |

Core i7-11700 vs Ryzen 7 3700X


Description
The i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 3700X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700 gets a score of 729 k points while the 3700X gets 483.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 1.5 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
870f10
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
98.87k points
74.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
728.98k points
483.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
35.12k
16.77k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
29.24k
26.29k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
8.79k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.95k
22.51k (x1.03)
TOTAL
98.87k
74.35k (x0.75)

Multithread

i7-11700

3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
304k
167.94k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
304.7k
209.85k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.64k
94.41k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.64k
11.27k (x1.06)
TOTAL
728.98k
483.47k (x0.66)

Performance/W
i7-11700
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4677 points/W
2584 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4688 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1687 points/W
1452 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
11215 points/W
7438 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11700
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
7168 points/GHz
3811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5967 points/GHz
5976 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2563 points/GHz
1997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4479 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
TOTAL
20177 points/GHz
16898 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4