Core i5-11400F vs Ryzen 7 3700X
Description
The i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 3700X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the 3700X gets 483.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the 3700X gets 483.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
870f10
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
74.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
495.65k points
483.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400F
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
31.66k
16.77k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
26.21k
26.29k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
8.79k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.5k
22.51k (x1.22)
TOTAL
88.34k
74.35k (x0.84)
Multithread
i5-11400F
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
210.36k
167.94k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
203.84k
209.85k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.05k
94.41k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
11.27k (x1.2)
TOTAL
495.65k
483.47k (x0.98)
Performance/W
i5-11400F
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3236 points/W
2584 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3136 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1108 points/W
1452 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
145 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
7625 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11400F
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
7196 points/GHz
3811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5976 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2718 points/GHz
1997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4205 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
TOTAL
20076 points/GHz
16898 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4