| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i7-5960X


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-5960X is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 238.9 k points while the i7-5960X gets 294.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-5960X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
306f2
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Haswell-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
68.19k points
13.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
238.87k points
294.29k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.96k
6.6k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
3.8k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.1k
1.41k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.71k
1.34k (x0.15)
TOTAL
68.19k
13.16k (x0.19)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
94.88k
146.65k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
99.81k
100.72k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.6k
34.09k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
12.83k (x1.21)
TOTAL
238.87k
294.29k (x1.23)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
3389 points/W
1047 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3565 points/W
719 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1200 points/W
243 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
378 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
8531 points/W
2102 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
6180 points/GHz
1887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5576 points/GHz
1086 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2405 points/GHz
403 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2075 points/GHz
384 points/GHz
TOTAL
16235 points/GHz
3759 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4