| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i5-7400


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 238.9 k points while the i5-7400 gets 173.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
906e9
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
68.19k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
238.87k points
173.7k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
12.72k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
19.3k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.9k
4.76k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.41k
8.73k (x0.93)
TOTAL
58.83k
45.52k (x0.77)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
45.69k
47.95k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
74.42k
71.98k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.8k
17.22k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
8.03k (x1.12)
TOTAL
157.08k
145.18k (x0.92)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
25.96k
22.37k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
19.46k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.1k
4.44k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.71k
6.41k (x0.74)
TOTAL
68.19k
52.69k (x0.77)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
94.88k
79.57k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
99.81k
71.41k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.6k
16.44k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
6.27k (x0.59)
TOTAL
238.87k
173.7k (x0.73)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
3389 points/W
1224 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3565 points/W
1099 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1200 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
378 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
8531 points/W
2672 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
6180 points/GHz
6392 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5576 points/GHz
5561 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2405 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2075 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
TOTAL
16235 points/GHz
15053 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4