| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i5-7300HQ


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 238.9 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 168.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
906e9
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
68.19k points
53.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
238.87k points
168.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.41k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
17.28k
14.14k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
4.41k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.81k
8.87k (x1.01)
TOTAL
39.34k
30.83k (x0.78)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
12.43k
12.75k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
54.95k
52.88k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.41k
16.25k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.38k
8.98k (x1.22)
TOTAL
101.16k
90.85k (x0.9)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.43k
11.71k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
16.74k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.18k
4.27k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.75k
7.81k (x0.8)
TOTAL
56.64k
40.53k (x0.72)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
40.24k
44.38k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
65.99k
62.55k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.51k
15.6k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
7.85k (x1.18)
TOTAL
141.4k
130.38k (x0.92)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
11.59k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
17.89k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.9k
4.14k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.41k
7.88k (x0.84)
TOTAL
58.83k
41.5k (x0.71)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
45.69k
44.42k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
74.42k
67.5k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.8k
14.6k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
8.06k (x1.13)
TOTAL
157.08k
134.58k (x0.86)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
25.96k
21.65k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
19.18k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.1k
4.38k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.71k
8.3k (x0.95)
TOTAL
68.19k
53.51k (x0.78)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
94.88k
77.12k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
99.81k
68.68k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.6k
15.24k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
7.78k (x0.74)
TOTAL
238.87k
168.81k (x0.71)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3389 points/W
1714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3565 points/W
1526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1200 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
378 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
8531 points/W
3751 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6180 points/GHz
6186 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5576 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2405 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2075 points/GHz
2372 points/GHz
TOTAL
16235 points/GHz
15289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4