| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i5-10400F


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 238.9 k points while the i5-10400F gets 369 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0653
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.19k points
68.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
238.87k points
369.01k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
4.3k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
17.28k
16.56k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
5.25k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.81k
12.61k (x1.43)
TOTAL
39.34k
38.72k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
12.43k
18.1k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
54.95k
79.16k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.41k
26.75k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.38k
13.81k (x1.87)
TOTAL
101.16k
137.82k (x1.36)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
25.96k
26.29k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
23.38k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.1k
5.51k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.71k
12.84k (x1.47)
TOTAL
68.19k
68.02k (x1)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
94.88k
163.37k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
99.81k
159.38k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.6k
38.87k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
7.39k (x0.7)
TOTAL
238.87k
369.01k (x1.54)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3389 points/W
2513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3565 points/W
2452 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1200 points/W
598 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
378 points/W
114 points/W
TOTAL
8531 points/W
5677 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6180 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5576 points/GHz
5437 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2405 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2075 points/GHz
2987 points/GHz
TOTAL
16235 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4