| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i5-10300H


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 238.9 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0652
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.19k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
238.87k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
15.65k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
23.13k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.9k
5.66k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.41k
11.43k (x1.21)
TOTAL
58.83k
55.87k (x0.95)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
45.69k
26.77k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
74.42k
43.81k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.8k
10.17k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
11.91k (x1.66)
TOTAL
157.08k
92.66k (x0.59)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.96k
27.14k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
24.75k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.1k
5.73k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.71k
11.84k (x1.36)
TOTAL
68.19k
69.47k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
94.88k
105.77k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
99.81k
107.47k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.6k
24.82k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
8.02k (x0.76)
TOTAL
238.87k
246.07k (x1.03)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3389 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3565 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1200 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
378 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
8531 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6180 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5576 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2405 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2075 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
16235 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4