| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 238.9 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.8 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
800f82
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
68.19k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
238.87k points
431.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
4.25k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
17.28k
19.72k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
5.84k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.81k
21.36k (x2.42)
TOTAL
39.34k
51.17k (x1.3)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.43k
35.04k (x2.82)
Test#2 (FP)
54.95k
181.42k (x3.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.41k
64.86k (x2.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.38k
8.21k (x1.11)
TOTAL
101.16k
289.54k (x2.86)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.43k
15.22k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
24.12k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.18k
5.87k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.75k
21k (x2.15)
TOTAL
56.64k
66.21k (x1.17)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
40.24k
126.81k (x3.15)
Test#2 (FP)
65.99k
229.86k (x3.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.51k
61.74k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
9.77k (x1.47)
TOTAL
141.4k
428.19k (x3.03)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
14.44k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
24.92k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.9k
5.8k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.41k
19.07k (x2.03)
TOTAL
58.83k
64.24k (x1.09)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
45.69k
122.01k (x2.67)
Test#2 (FP)
74.42k
220.34k (x2.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.8k
59.89k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
9.9k (x1.38)
TOTAL
157.08k
412.13k (x2.62)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.96k
15.34k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
25.75k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.1k
5.79k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.71k
17.95k (x2.06)
TOTAL
68.19k
64.83k (x0.95)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
94.88k
123.07k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
99.81k
239.3k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.6k
60.6k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
8.18k (x0.77)
TOTAL
238.87k
431.14k (x1.8)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3389 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3565 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1200 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
378 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
8531 points/W
4106 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6180 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5576 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2405 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2075 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
16235 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4