Core i5-1135G7 vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 238.9 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 238.9 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
800f82
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
68.19k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
238.87k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.96k
15.75k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
26.29k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.1k
5.91k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.71k
18.48k (x2.12)
TOTAL
68.19k
66.44k (x0.97)
Multithread
i5-1135G7
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
94.88k
94.49k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
99.81k
182.53k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.6k
45.95k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
10.15k (x0.96)
TOTAL
238.87k
333.12k (x1.39)
Performance/W
i5-1135G7
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3389 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3565 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1200 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
378 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
8531 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6180 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5576 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2405 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2075 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
16235 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4