Core i5-1135G7 vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 238.9 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 238.9 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
810f10
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
68.19k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
238.87k points
198.27k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.8k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
17.28k
17.38k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
5.17k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.81k
3.16k (x0.36)
TOTAL
39.34k
29.52k (x0.75)
Multithread
i5-1135G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.43k
15.28k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
54.95k
76.44k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.41k
27.48k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.38k
3.02k (x0.41)
TOTAL
101.16k
122.2k (x1.21)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.43k
13.95k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
20.7k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.18k
5.33k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.75k
3.03k (x0.31)
TOTAL
56.64k
43.01k (x0.76)
Multithread
i5-1135G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
40.24k
58.56k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
65.99k
92.95k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.51k
28.55k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
2.98k (x0.45)
TOTAL
141.4k
183.04k (x1.29)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
13.04k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
22.35k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.9k
5.37k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.41k
3.4k (x0.36)
TOTAL
58.83k
44.15k (x0.75)
Multithread
i5-1135G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
45.69k
56.49k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
74.42k
100.74k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.8k
28.21k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
3.04k (x0.42)
TOTAL
157.08k
188.49k (x1.2)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.96k
14.2k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
23.23k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.1k
5.35k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.71k
5.18k (x0.59)
TOTAL
68.19k
47.96k (x0.7)
Multithread
i5-1135G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
94.88k
58.24k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
99.81k
105.72k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.6k
28.73k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
5.59k (x0.53)
TOTAL
238.87k
198.27k (x0.83)
Performance/W
i5-1135G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3389 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3565 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1200 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
378 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
8531 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6180 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5576 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2405 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2075 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
16235 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4