Core i3-1115G4 vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5900HX is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HX is 3.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HX is 3.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
a50f00
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
85.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
421.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
23.29k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
25.89k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
11.75k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
24.83k (x3.43)
TOTAL
62.19k
85.76k (x1.38)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
138.16k (x2.43)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
192.12k (x3.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
80.84k (x4.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
9.93k (x1.63)
TOTAL
137.96k
421.05k (x3.05)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
3070 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
4269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1796 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
221 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
9357 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
5064 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5628 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
5398 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
18644 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4