| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 3.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a50f00
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
4.31k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
17.51k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
10.53k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
23.57k (x2.87)
TOTAL
38.97k
55.92k (x1.44)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
24.18k (x2.63)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
117.98k (x3.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
70.96k (x3.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
8.08k (x1.39)
TOTAL
69.62k
221.19k (x3.18)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
20.37k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
22.52k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
10.18k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
21.49k (x2.97)
TOTAL
62.19k
74.56k (x1.2)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
144.01k (x2.53)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
191.86k (x3.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
84.53k (x4.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
6.5k (x1.07)
TOTAL
137.96k
426.9k (x3.09)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4